Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > Abuni_versem7 > My Blog |
|
Oct 2018: EHCR upholds blasphemy against Mohammed as a crime. (Are you kidding me???) The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) seems to find this completely acceptable, seen in a judgement delivered on 25th October 2018 (E.S. c/Austria 38450/), by which an Austrian woman saw her fine of several hundred euros confirmed for having dared to criticise the sexuality of Mohammed. The case against a woman known as E.S, stems from a public symposium in Austria with alleged statements of paedophilia regarding the age of Aisha when first married to Mohammed. The ECHR found her guilty and charged her some Euros fine or 60 days in jail. The decison was upheld on appeal. Obviously, lack of concrete evidence after more than 00 years had something to do with this, as well as that such age-differential practices are presently banned. The statement was construed by the court as an attack on Islam so as to discredit the Prophet otherwise worthy of worship, said the court. OK then. But here is why this decision is fundamentally flawed... By the same standard, the Islamic assertion that Mohammed was the 'last prophet' is direct blasphemy to Christianity according to the following Bible verses: 28 And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. --1 Corinthians (Paul the Apostle) And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ.--Ephesians 4 (Paul the Apostle) All Christians agree that Paul was guided by the unction of the Holy Ghost. And the person offended need not lay claim to being a prophet himself.  And likewise, the very assertion of these Bible passages is seen as blasphemy against Mohammed, by their very content.  So then, in for a penny and in for a pound; name calling is also fair game versus 's idol. After all, name calling is just an opinion. In the USA, opinion is still protected free speech. As a matter of fact, US HR 349 (1th Congress 20-201  calls for the global repeal of all anti-blasphemy laws, including those against Christianity. I doubt very much that Trump or Congress will hinder this legislation, even if the rest of the world decides to deny this request after it becomes ratified, by keeping such laws. And Trump himself will do everything in his power to thwart globalists. And even if the US adopts anti-blasphemy laws, the individual context of an offense will be very subjective. Regardless of what people may think, there is absolutely NO incitement to violence here of any kind on my part, so what you do after that is YOUR own problem. If is going to disparage my religion by saying that 'there are no more prophets', than be ready for me to disparage your religion as well. Be able to take what you dish out. There will be no double standard here as to those that are otherwise spoiled 
|
|||
|
Above scene pic from The Wall-Pink Floyd. Children taught to hide their God-given indentity behind a mask of tradition.
| ||
2/2/2019 2:12 pm |
Long live Salman Rushdie and the Satanic Verses 
|
×
×