Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

Abuni_versem7 61M
91 posts
1/30/2019 6:38 am
Muhammed: a false prophet versus Anti-Islamic tweet from Maldavian woman Shahindha Ismail

The followers of Islam are continuously fooling themselves. Their 'beloved prophet' made at least one prediction that never came to fruition.

I will once again on a passage from historian Edward Gibbon(1737-1794), from his work entitled "The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire".


"While the Persian monarch [Chosroes II] contemplated the wonders of
his art and power, he received an epistle from an obscure citizen of Mecca, inviting him to acknowledge Mahomet as the apostle of God. He rejected the invitation, and tore the epsitle. 'It is thus,' exclaimed the Arabian prophet, 'that God will tear the kingdom, and reject the supplications of Chosroes.' Placed on the verge of the two great empires of the East, Mahomet observed with secret joy the progress of their mutual destruction; and in the midst of the Persian triumphs, he ventured to foretell, that before many should elapse, victory should again return to the banners of the Romans. At the time when this prediction is said to have been delivered, no prophecy could be more distant from its accomplishment, since the first twelve of Heraclius announced the approaching dissolution of the empire."

Now the Byzantines did defeat the Persians at Jerusalem in AD 628, but this was not accomplished 'in a few years ', as Muhammed had predicted. According to Yusuf Ali the Arabic word for "a few ," Bidh'un, signifies a period of three to nine ; yet according to the historical records the victory did not come until nearly fourteen years later. -See Jerusalem AD 614-628.

So then Muhammed is NOT a prophet. He was only speaking out of spite for being rejected. Yet it just so happened that God, the Father of Jesus allowed Muhammed to afflict the Eastern Roman empire, according to Revelation 9, which was written by one apostle or disciple "John", with divine guidance on one certain Sabbath day on the island of Patmos, circa AD 81-96. That makes him greater than Muhammed indeed. For it is the altar that sanctifies the gift, not the gift itself. --Matthew 23 vs 19.

As a matter of fact, the first advances of the Saracens were nothing more than that of thieves and thugs, driven by nothing more than fraud and enthusiasm. Their Muslim religion can be reduced down to mere darkness and delusion.

This can easily be seen by the extremely radical character of ISIS, which cannot evolve otherwise, when given to the notion of a 'chosen people', which can do no wrong, whose mere tradition is no more than a front to mask the fact that they are all fatherless and disowned (by parents that teach them to worship the creature over tlhe Creator, yet all in the name of Allah). Actions speak louder than words, since Muhammed's religion of self defense is obviously based on the fear of not being resurrected. There is neither a 'Seal of God' here as well as no Seal of the Prophets, where Muhammed is concerned.

The Holy Bible only includes Islam as it relates to the fall of the Roman Empire (Byzantine). --See 5th Trumpet, Revelation 9. There is thus no holy assignment to Islam proper. Muhammed died in AD 632, and never rose after that. This is typical of all mortals in the bible. Islam does not preach any atonement for sin (aka Jesus Chirst), and thus illuminates the works of man as without the of a Holy Intercessor. Ok then, so be it; they will have to for their sins at their own eventual deaths, and thus NO resurrection, which would otherwise be imparted them by faith in the Messiah.

In conclusion, the Muslim individual is in reality, and quite subconsciously, deferring himself to a pseudo form of deliverence via the physical conquests of Muhammed, whether it be land or people. The real for deliverance however, lies in that which escapes the grave. God's true people will never settle for anything less.

Of course, other errant religions subscribe to self defense as well, but that is not the topic of this blog.

Not even Jesus was the last prophet. And there were even females that prophesied as well. LOLz.

8 Leaving the next day, we reached Caesarea and stayed at the house of Philip the evangelist, one of the Seven. 9 He had four unmarried daughters who prophesied. --Acts 21
What would these women have said about Mohammed and all his violence?

Below pic of is that of Shahindha Ismail, Founder and Executive Director of Maldavian Democratic Network, Maldives. She is presently being threatened and harrassed for an Anti-Islamic tweet. She could face a jail term of 5 .
Grrrrrrrrrrrr.



Abuni_versem7 61M
159 posts
1/30/2019 7:09 am

15 The simple believeth every word: but the prudent man looketh well to his going. --Proverbs 14 vs 15